Welcome back!
To access the BAI Banking Strategies subscriber edition, please log in with your BAI Account ID and password.

 

Not sure if you are a BAI Member?




 
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Please enter the Account ID you used to subscribe and we will send you an email with instructions on how to change your password.
 
 
 
     Cancel

Subscribing gives you free access to hundreds of articles and other benefits including BAI Banking Strategies daily email alerts. Already a BAI Member? Click here to log in and subscribe. Not sure if you are a BAI Member? Click here to find out. Otherwise, become a BAI Member below to subscribe.

*
*
*
 
*
 
*
*
*


highlights

 

Connecting to Payments Change

The changing world of payments technology confronts bank executives with many tough decisions in regard to allocating scarce investment dollars. Should we play in the mobile wallet space, and if so, with which partners?



The Year Ahead: CIO Perspectives for 2013 Executive Report

When did technology take over our lives? For most of us, it was about the time we purchased our first smartphone and then later added a tablet on top of that, both of which we now can’t leave home without.



Decision Time for Banks on Mobile Wallet
Whether they fly solo or with partners, financial institutions need to begin placing their bets in the mobile wallet game. by AMIR TABAKOVIC
Jan 4, 2013  |  9 Comments

As the hype around mobile wallets continues to build, many banks find themselves at a crossroads in their strategic thinking.

On the one hand, a mobile wallet represents a valuable communications channel through which banks can deepen customer relationships, gain valuable insight into spending habits and a clearer understanding of customer attitudes toward new products and services. Advocates promise new revenues for banks too, through customer profiling data collected by mobile wallets.

Yet, big questions remain over when, or even if, mass market mobile wallet adoption will ever be achieved. Detractors maintain that the supporting infrastructure (for both consumer use and merchant acceptance) may still fail to mature to a point where it is able to support widespread adoption. What’s more, the mobile wallet’s complex and crowded development ecosystem is unchartered territory for many banks, making evaluating strategic options harder still. Due consideration must be given to the commercial agendas of a wide variety of stakeholders with whom many banks have had little prior experience. Merchants, mobile network operators (MNOs), device manufacturers, mobile marketers together with a wide range of niche service providers are all vying for influence. How then should a bank approach weighing up its options?

In our view, banks should be guided by a simple yet fundamental question: “Do our customers consider the mobile wallet to be valuable?” lf the answer is “no” and the bank concludes that the whole offering will never take off, then it can refocus resources on more familiar territory, such as online services and mobile banking. But if the answer is “yes,” then it should act now to engage with the market before third-party wallets have the chance to establish dominance.

Fly Solo or in Partnership?

Fundamentally, there are two routes a bank could take to participate in mobile wallets:

Fly solo. A bank could opt to develop a 100% proprietary solution over which it has complete control, ensuring that it retains exclusivity over its customer relationships. This option also enables delivery of the bank’s own digital content to customers without jostling for customer attention with competing third parties in the app. A proprietary mobile wallet could also reduce time-to-market by coordinating all design and development internally.

But this route is fraught with difficulty since several factors crucial to a mobile wallet’s success sit well outside the core competencies of a conventional bank. Obviously, the mobile wallet’s strength will come from the variety and allure of additional services that the technology can offer users, together with the unique value-add those services provide. Banks, with little experience in these fields, would find themselves up against a growing number of specialist value-added service (VAS) providers operating both independently and in partnership with MNOs and merchants.

Issues relating to technical integration and payment service interoperability are likely to further complicate matters for banks looking to go it alone. Most mobile wallets will aim to support a range of payment facilities, from cloud-based remote payments to contactless proximity payments, using near field communications (NFC). These, together with a growing range of mobile point-of-sale acceptance technologies are at the center of their own development ecosystems, the majority of which operate independently of the banking community.

At the very least, a proprietary mobile wallet solution from a bank will require engagement with an MNO or payment network in order to support the exchange of payment and VAS data to and from the wallet.

Seek partners. An alternative route is to develop a mobile wallet proposition in partnership with other stakeholders. By taking this approach, a bank would be able to focus on its core competencies and leverage the expertise of its partners and its digitally-engaged customers to create a mobile wallet proposition that delivers greater customer value than a proprietary alternative.

Such “innovation networks” that are built from collaboration between cross industry stakeholders can spark new ideas which can lead to the inception of valuable services. Pooling the expertise of different stakeholders can also result in a solution capable of scaling rapidly, thanks to each stakeholder’s ability to identify and rectify challenges in their field before they grind development to a halt. A co-branded solution with high profile stakeholders, be they internet giants, MNOs, merchants or other financial institutions, will increase reach and may also enhance customer confidence in the solution, boosting adoption rates further.

Stakeholder Issues

But there are complications here, too. Any bank considering this approach must strive to understand each stakeholder’s intentions, together with the market dynamics that will ultimately govern the actions of potential future partners. Entrusting one’s customer base to a partnership requires an extraordinary level of trust and shared risk. Internet giants, for example, consider the mobile wallet to be an area ripe for use as a tool to protect and generate profits from within their existing customer ecosystems.

MNOs, meanwhile, seek to host the secure payment credentials needed to execute a transaction on the device’s SIM card, generating revenues from each payment. This means an MNO may resist a bank’s efforts to integrate alternative solutions, where the secure credential is hosted on an embedded NFC chip, a microSD card, or on a remote server in the cloud, for example. Banks should be prepared to take a view on these emerging alternatives before committing themselves to a contract.

Merchants and VAS providers are starting to create their own payments networks and branded wallet experiences which could, through partnership, also serve the interests of banks. While unresolved questions remain over customer privacy and each stakeholder’s entitlement to the use of customer profiling data collected via the mobile wallet, there is no doubt that additional information about the spending behavior of current and potential customers has value. It is also widely acknowledged that the proliferation of valuable services available in a mobile wallet will be key to driving mass adoption, indicating that these issues are likely to be addressed as the mobile wallet market matures.

In payments specifically, the digital payment networks are developing and promoting their own branded mobile wallets, together with capabilities for simultaneous cooperative and competitive efforts with third-party solutions. Online payment facilities are also vying to establish a presence in the development ecosystem, offering a front-end payment mechanism that is linked to credit and debit cards, automated clearing houses and merchant stored-value. This model, a simple extension of well-established e-commerce practices, threatens to reduce a bank’s customer visibility in the mobile wallet space by taking control of the front-end payment interface, thus squeezing banks into a processing-only role in the value chain.

Overall, mobile wallet strategy is not only about technology, but includes building and protecting a valuable role for banks in the mobile wallet value chain. Banks wishing to engage with the mobile wallet must balance multiple, simultaneous challenges in an emerging space and do so without impacting customer security or convenience. Since the end-state remains unclear, multiple simultaneous bets must be placed to ensure a role in years to come.

Opting to ignore the space entirely remains on the table but we believe that can be painfully detrimental to a financial institution as mobile wallets develop through multiple generations. To ignore the mobile wallet is to risk a cornerstone in a highly competitive and fast moving digital ecosystem. Understanding the dynamics of the industry is crucial if a bank is to take an assured first step into the marketplace.

Mr. Tabakovic is chairman of the Mobile Wallet Taskforce at Helsinki, Finland-based Mobey Forum, which provides a platform for discussion, networking and knowledge sharing in mobile financial services. He can be reached at elina.mattila@mobeyforum.org. A fuller discussion of mobile wallets can be found in Mobey Forum’s recent white papers on the topic.

Stay connected to Expert Perspectives, Research and Intelligence — subscribe to BAI Banking Strategies now!

 

comments

Would you like to make a comment? Log In

nick brown
1/31/2013 6:17 PM

Something else to consider. Almost all mobile payment systems utilize the existing infrastructure - namely the credit/debit card networks. This system was phenomenal at the time, and has been extremely successful over the years. The problems more recently surrounding these systems is they were only ever intended in a situation when the customer physically hands the card over to the merchant (card present). Specifically, they were never intended for online transactions - in the US there is currently about $2bn of fraudulent transaction online out of $200bn, while only $1bn fraud on $3.4tr in store. This card system was never intended when the card number can be entered electronically! In countries where "Chip and Pin" has been implemented, in-store fraud has plummeted, while online fraud has grown - this new technology works for it's intended market but doesn't work online. The reason I am going on about 'online' transactions is we should be considering the smartphone as the next generation of computer, and therefore mobile fraud in the next generation of online fraud! Look at some of the statements and predictions of Marc Andreessen (of Netscape) regarding Smartphones.

nick brown
1/31/2013 6:05 PM

Absolutely Chris. There are several types of mobile payment system. Most involve the use of NFC (Near Field Communication), which involves the transfer of information between the mobile device and a point of sale device. Some people insist that NFC has a limited range - the reality is the range is only limited by the sensitivity of the receiver. Anyone with a sensitive enough receiver can sit outside a store and catch all NFC communication! If this includes your card number, then it is now stolen. In addition, from the bank's perspective, there is no actual guarantee that the card number belongs to the actual customer. Some mobile payment systems are better than others, but most have leave some sort of fraud hole. When "Chip and Pin" cards are instituted in a few years here in the US, a system that is extremely expensive but has been hugely successful in drastically reducing in-store fraud, the banks will not like the idea of a new fraud hole. They will likely classify mobile payments as "card not present" (accurately) which will put the transaction in a similar category as online transactions, where most fraud is passed on the the merchant. Mobile fraud WILL become a problem when the market is big enough to go after, and then how long do you think merchant will accept mobile payments if they are liable for the fraud?

chris del balzo
1/28/2013 11:34 AM

Hi Nick, for the benefit of this thread and conversation can you factualize your statement about fraud, in particular << For most mobile payment systems out there, they are leaving a huge security hole for anyone to walk right through. The banks know this >>? I certainly would like to know more detail about it

nick brown
1/28/2013 9:16 AM

This is a great article, but there is one point that is missing - fraud. While we are all looking at the services provided to the merchant and customer, the banks have to look at the potential for fraud, and whether they will end up being liable for it. So far, fraud has not been an issue due to the tiny size of the market. However, once the market size increases, it will become a target. For most mobile payment systems out there, they are leaving a huge security hole for anyone to walk right through. The banks know this. The banks are likely to adopt a mobile payment system when they find one that protects them.

amir tabakovic
1/27/2013 3:36 PM

Dan I fully agree with you. The ecosystem is the key. The complexity raises with all the stakeholder involved. We can only guess which stakeholders will prevail but it is our obligation to think through the options different stakeholders have and interests that they follow. That's why I think that Chris' comment is so valuable because it dives deeper into details. As a non-US industry practitioner I would welcome other readers to continue the discussion based on Chris' comment.

chris del balzo
1/25/2013 7:57 AM

Good objective synopsis Amir. Right now there are just too many mobile wallet providers and not enough ROI for banks and retailers alike to justify any meaningful investments for 2013. But I believe we are getting closer to the tipping point. From a consumer view payments are driven by convenience (legacy POS systems in stores are overwhelmingly credit card oriented), security (paradoxically, mobile banking transactions are more secure than PC OLB payments, but that msg has not resonated with consumers yet), simplicity (value-add of current mobile wallets hasn’t overcome simplicity of a credit card transaction) and liability (will a rogue transaction be protected by FTC or CFPB? A wireless telecommunications carrier's statutory obligations are almost the precise opposite of a financial institution’s). I think the tipping point in the US will be the required October 2015 deadline pushed by Visa, MasterCard and Amex for U.S. retailers to upgrade to POS terminals with better security (liability for fraud transactions will be shifted to merchants who have not upgraded their POS terminals to process transactions made with EMV cards). Also, the newly created MCX mobile payment exchange will create ubiquity and drive mainstream usage, thanks to the participation of 15 US retailers with a trillion dollar in sales among them. Finally, I would also like to see the regulatory system in this country step up to the plate big - a la Check 21 ten years ago - clarify liability language for mobile transactions and educate customers on their security.

dan phelps
1/24/2013 7:38 AM

I agree with Michael, this is an excellent summary I think Ecosystem is key here. Wallets touch areas like MNOs, retail apps, merchants, vouchers, mobile tech, loyalty and other areas which for some Banks isn't a traditional space to play in. Partnerships and communities will become more important and the space where industries cross can spark innovation - "innovation networks" is a great term. We must also not forget the customers as they more than ever decide what is a success or not!

amir tabakovic
1/24/2013 6:50 AM

Thank you Michael! I am glad to hear it.

michael lehman
1/7/2013 9:42 AM

This is the best executive summary of this issue/opportunity that I've read to date. It explains the situation clearly, outlines the possible responses and encourages banks to decide promptly which direction they will follow. Thanks very much!