| Efficiency
Plus
By Steve Klinkerman
Efficiency projects work best
within the context of organizational renewal not
as blunt-force instruments
The banking industry has been obsessed
with efficiency over the last decade. Institutions sought
to lower operating expenses as a percent of revenues by
several means, including massive reengineering projects
and merger-driven consolidation. At one level, the crusade
did have some effect: industry-wide expense ratios have
come down. But revenue growth remains a challenge.
This highlights a potential trap in
streamlining, namely, that merging institutions can wind
up fine-tuning business models that remain out of step
with the market. Efficiency programs are misplaced when
they only refine processes for which demand is stagnating.
There's no revenue growth, and even profitability gains
will eventually fade as old business models experience
further decay.
From this perspective, the larger work
of efficiency is advancing the renewal of the organization.
This marries the exercise with a variety of other banking
priorities. Instead of blunt-force steps such as head-count
reduction and branch closings, the top-level emphasis
is on clarifying organizational strategy; capital redeployment;
partnerships and alliances; re-engineering; digitization;
and outsourcing. Expense considerations are suffused in
all of these activities, of course, but they don't monopolize
the discussions.
When Thomas Theobald was chief executive
of the former Continental Bank Corp., Chicago, he once
remarked: "Unless you have a strategy, you can't possibly
hope to be efficient." That insight resonates strongly
today, when even mega-banks are realizing that doing all
things can translate into doing nothing particularly well.
At the very least, institutions should be clear about
the major market segments they will pursue. Otherwise,
organizational energies are dissipated.
Acting on this concept, in turn, requires
that companies weed out weaker business activities so
that the stronger ones can grow. To refine a portfolio
of businesses, for example, each unit can be evaluated
for its growth potential, strategic significance, synergy,
capital intensity, profitability and volatility. Letting
go of operations that score poorly frees up human and
financial resources for more productive pursuits.
The same principle is at work in re-engineering,
with the difference that the portfolio is comprised of
activities rather than business units. The goal here is
not only to streamline internal administrative and business
processes, but also to free up employees so that the best
possible use can be made of their time. As Bill Gates
says in Business @ the Speed
of Thought, "It's just common sense that knowledge
workers who are not distracted or burdened by routine
matters will do better work. The benefit to customers
is that your employees spend less time shuffling papers
and more time on customer needs."
At the same time, companies must be
careful about how they structure new ventures. Solo enterprises
don't always work well in e-commerce, a volatile market
that makes heavy demands on capital and expertise. Through
alliances and partnerships, institutions can accelerate
the pace of innovation while lowering individual risks
and outlays. This approach brings efficiency to the realm
of development, and it is widely used in payments-related
ventures in the banking industry.
Another efficiency avenue, digitization,
does in fact offer opportunities to automate traditional
processes, and sometimes the exercise can be quite worthwhile.
Imaging technology, for example, can help to streamline
the check-clearing process. But there are other, more
strategic, digital applications that replace conventional
methods altogether, such as e-mail payments. Along with
the appeal of efficiency, such applications have the allure
of opening new markets.
Similarly, outsourcing has a role in
streamlining traditional internal functions such as payroll,
benefits administration and internal audit. But it also
has a strong strategic aspect when it's used to augment
organizational service and product capabilities on behalf
of the customer.
The point in these examples is that efficiency-related
pursuits work best within a strategic context. And that
turns the pressure right back on senior managers to think
clearly and creatively about where they want to steer
their organizations. Built on this foundation, efficiency
can sparkle. Built on any other, it's just a stopgap measure.
Mr. Klinkerman is
Editor-in-Chief of Banking Strategies.
Copyright © 2003 by Banking
Strategies, published by BAI.
back
to top |