BAI Publications
 
Thursday, November 20, 2008   
 E-mail This Page   
September/October 2001
Volume LXXVII Number V
Published by BAI

Subscribe to Banking Strategies...it's a must read
CONTENTS
Table of Contents || Publisher's Perspective || Reading the Clickstream || Clinching the Partnership || Connecting with Customers || Making I-Payments Pay || For Efficiency's Sake || Closing Thoughts || About Banking Strategies

Alliance for Profit

By Thomas P. Johnson Jr.

Bankers need to take their alliances more seriously if they wish to maximize the value of these arrangements.

Banking companies have struck a wide array of alliances and partnerships with non-bank firms to help them in asset management, product distribution, and most importantly, e-commerce. Since not even the largest bank has the resources to go it alone in all these areas, such affiliations make sense. Indeed, Speer & Associates estimates the top 100 banks alone are involved in several thousand partnerships.

Whether these arrangements are reaching their full potential is another matter. Recent research by Accenture, across many different industries, shows that 30% of all alliances fail outright, while another 49% substantially fail to meet expectations. Forrester Research Inc., in its own survey, identified "ongoing alignment" and "keeping momentum" as the two biggest challenges that partners encounter.

This issue's cover story, which looks at bank alliances specifically, questions whether institutions are giving their alliances the strategic priority they deserve. There's a risk that such ventures can fade into irrelevance from lack of senior management attention. Parochialism is another stumbling block. As described by writer John R. Engen, executives are reluctant to cede much discretion to their nonbank partners, who end up functioning more as glorified outsourcers than as true collaborators.

Some of this reticence is understandable. Bankers are steeped in a risk management culture that recoils from exposing the institution to potential dangers or uncertainty. It is possible, however, to minimize the risks in alliances. Protective actions include methodical screening of vendors, detailed contracts and a governance structure that provides for strong leadership and accountability.

The value of a good alliance can be seen in our article about Internet payments, or person-to-person payments, a new technology that allows individuals to transmit funds to each other over the Internet. As writer Lauri Giesen points out, one of the most promising bank ventures in this field is an alliance between Wells Fargo & Co. and P2P payments provider Billpoint Inc. Wells Fargo owns 35% of Billpoint; the remainder is controlled by online auctioneer eBay Inc.

The venture unites Wells Fargo's payments expertise with Billpoint's Internet payments technology and deploys that package on eBay's Web site, one of the most popular venues for P2P payments. While it's too early to judge Wells Fargo's ultimate success, the example does suggest what can be accomplished with alliances.


In an interview last year, consultant Richard Schroth said financial services executives need to move beyond their old world of proprietary business models into a new era of networks, where collaboration is often the primary means of creating wealth. Judging by what's going on in Internet payments, that networked era is upon us.

Copyright © 2003 by Banking Strategies, published by BAI.

back to top

 
© 2008 BAI. All Rights Reserved. Contact Us  |  Site Map  |  Our Terms and Conditions  |  Web Site Specifications  |  Home