| De Novo Challenge
By
Thomas P. Johnson, Jr.
Branch expansionists must match
boldness with discipline if they are to achieve the growth
they seek.
Why on earth would major banks be opening
hundreds of new branches at a time when the economy is
limping along and the threats of war and terrorism continue
to roil global politics? It does seem counterintuitive,
yet savvy strategists believe this is the time to strike.
While it is always wise to take current
circumstances into account, periods of uncertainty, in
fact, can provide the best times for undertaking strategic
initiatives. As weaker competitors struggle, stronger
players can leverage their capital, brands and systems
to gain market share. In the wake of the '90s banking
consolidation, numerous financial institutions are positioned
to make strategic moves on a national basis.
Bank of America Corp., for example,
is planning to build 550 branches over the next three
years in the nation's top 25 markets. "Even in tough
times, you've got to grow your revenue, and we think this
is a very good use of our capital," says Liam McGee,
Bank of America's top retail executive. Washington Mutual
Inc. is engaged in an expansion of similar scope, and
many other banks are launching regional de novo programs.
This movement is driven by a search
for organic growth. Disappointed with mergers and electronic
delivery channels, banks are reaffirming the primacy of
the branch in customer acquisition and retention. With
new outlets, the logic goes, de novo expansionists can
avoid the merger-related problems of systems integration,
culture clashes and service disruptions, plus they can
pinpoint their target markets.
The trouble is, many banks are targeting
the same cities, such as Chicago and New York, setting
up a bruising battle for market share. Since customers
will ultimately decide who wins, the competitive terrain
will shift to subtler factors such as competitive differentiation,
marketing prowess and service quality. Strength alone
will not carry the day.
To be sure, players such as Bank of
America and Washington Mutual seem to recognize that.
Both are building branches designed to emulate top retailers,
such as Nordstrom and Starbucks, by offering extraordinary
levels of visual appeal, technological pizzazz, convenience
and service.
This can pose a substantial expense
burden, however, at a time when expense control may become
more important than executives originally anticipated.
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas economist Harvey Rosenblum,
for example, warns that a prolonged period of price stability,
of the type last seen in the 1950s, could depress rather
than help bank profitability. Consultants at McKinsey
& Co., meanwhile, warn that the profitability of the
basic deposit-taking business will come under renewed
pressure in coming years.
The question, then, is whether the de
novo expansionists can match boldness with discipline.
In the current environment, one won't go very far without
the other.
Mr. Johnson
is publisher of Banking Strategies
and president and chief executive officer of BAI.
Copyright © 2003 by Banking
Strategies, published by BAI.
back
to top |