| Buzz
Meister
By Kenneth Cline
Marketing guru Stephen Cone says
bank advertising badly needs a dose of excitement.
Is bank advertising too dull?
Stephen A. Cone certainly thinks so.
Having previously worked with KeyCorp, American Express
Co. and Fidelity Investments, the 53-year old Citigroup
Inc. executive brings an unparalleled perspective to his
assessment of the current state of bank advertising. And
he doesn't like what he sees.
"Most banks don't have any excitement
in their advertising," says Cone, the marketing head at
Citigroup's global investment management unit. "I don't
think there's any correlation between 'safe and secure'
and 'dull and boring.'"
Cone, who inserted comedians Lily Tomlin
and Don Rickles into Fidelity ads and built KeyCorp commercials
around television star Anthony Edwards ("ER"), says financial
institutions need to build brand image in both good times
and bad. Differentiation from competitors requires advertisements
that "create excitement," which Cone defines as inspiring
enthusiasm in customers and employees alike.
While easily stated, creating a buzz
around a brand or product poses a major managerial challenge.
A campaign must first be sold within the company itself
to energize executives and particularly front-line staff.
Employees, says Cone, "are your front-line ambassadors.
If they are excited, the enthusiasm will transfer to customers."
Cone is currently trying to generate
this kind of enthusiasm around television ads promoting
Citigroup's mutual funds. Instead of using well-known
actors, he features Citigroup's own mutual fund managers,
who talk about their portfolios and investment strategies.
While this campaign has generally been
well received, Cone's past work has not been without controversy.
The Fidelity commercials, in which Tomlin and Rickles
sought investment advice from retired star money manager
Peter Lynch, were panned by some industry critics as being
clunky and forced.
But those complaints may be beside
the point, since the commercials grabbed attention and
are still talked about in the industry. In Cone's world,
the worst sin is not to be noticed. Banking
Strategies interviewed Cone last November during
BAI's Retail Delivery conference in New Orleans.
Banking Strategies:
What's the general state of advertising in financial services?
Cone:
For the most part, bank advertising has been bland. The
visuals have all kind of looked the same, with images
of people walking on the beach, sitting in their family
room or playing golf at sunset. I call these "homogenized
Kodak moments." Nothing stands out. Most banks don't have
any excitement in their advertising.
Banking Strategies:
Isn't it important for banks to convey an image of safety
and soundness?
Cone:
But that doesn't mean you have to be dull and boring.
I don't think there's any correlation between "safe and
secure" and "dull and boring." With hundreds of television
channels and publications today, it's increasingly difficult
to get the consumer's attention.
Banking Strategies:
Do marketing professionals such as you often have to butt
heads with non-marketing executives over these kinds of
issues? Is there a cultural clash?
Cone:
I haven't experienced a lot of pushback on the content.
When pushback occurs, it typically involves the issue
of whether we can sustain the campaign in both good and
bad times. Some managers might argue it's better to put
marketing dollars back into the kitty, so to speak, when
the business and/or economy is soft. Marketing, particularly
advertising, tends to be the first line item to go. Intellectually,
I actually understand that, but don't necessarily agree.
So the contentious issue is typically
the ongoing commitment of dollars, not any resistance
to bold ideas.
Banking Strategies:
What was the state of Citigroup's brand advertising when
you arrived there in February 2000? What have you done
to move it in new directions?
Cone:
I came to Citigroup to head up marketing for one of our
business units, global investment management. Working
with a number of marketing colleagues from the other business
units, we had the task of making sense out of all the
various brands that Citigroup encompasses, such as Citibank,
Travelers and Smith Barney. At that time, the business
units used different visuals, in some cases, different
logos. To put it another way, there was no common brand
identity across the businesses.
I was part of a group that came up
with a framework that includes common visual elements
across all the businesses — like the red umbrella
and the blue "wave." We also use common nomenclature wherever
possible. For example, the word "Citigroup" is either
in the primary name of the business unit or in small type
on a business card or other media to make the point that
this business is part of Citigroup.
Banking Strategies:
What's the role of taglines in this positioning?
Cone:
Citigroup is such a large company that each major business
requires its own positioning, although all of them share
common visual elements. Customer groups are different,
so our businesses need their own positioning and, in most
cases, their own taglines.
Ideally, companies and business units,
once they establish a good positioning, should keep it
as singular as possible. But that isn't always possible.
Following the late '90s merger between Citicorp and Travelers
Corp., the combined entity's business units either developed
their own taglines or continued to use a derivative of
an old one. Smith Barney, for example, started out in
the '80s with the famous line, "We make money the old
fashioned way — we earn it." After the merger, they
started using, "See how we earn it." The current variation
is, "This is who we are — This is how we earn it."
Back in the '70s, Citibank used the
well-known tagline, "The Citi never sleeps." That was
changed in the mid-'90s, to "Where money lives." The current
tagline is "Live Richly."
Banking Strategies:
Any thought to reviving "The Citi never sleeps?"
Cone:
There's no thought to resurrecting it. The old Citibank
is now part of the new Citigroup. I wasn't around when
they decided to drop that tagline, and therefore can't
comment as to the thinking at the time.
Marketers, in general, often don't
build properly on a company's heritage. But there are
pros and cons to these issues. Sometimes you want to sound
more contemporary and resonate better with what customers
want today. The business of positioning and creating strong
taglines is much more art than science.
Banking Strategies:
What is the value of brand positioning or brand advertising
in an industry where names frequently change because of
acquisitions?
Cone:
Brand advertising is always worthwhile because you're
always competing with other institutions in local markets.
Regardless of whether the brand you're marketing is going
to be there forever, you still have to differentiate yourself
from the local competition. If your brand name changes
a few years down the road, ideally you should sustain
the campaign but just use the new name.
Promoting a brand involves a lot more
than advertising, by the way. It brings press attention.
And it includes talking to your employees on a regular
basis about what the brand stands for and how they should
interact with customers. It's making sure the customer
experience reinforces the brand.
If a brand is strong, the institution's
name can change without too much damage.
Banking
Strategies: Which is more important: advertising
specific products, such as checking accounts, or promoting
the overall brand image?
Cone:
You can promote the brand and a product at the same time;
they're not mutually exclusive. In fact, brand advertising
can often promote specific products as part of the campaign.
The brand advertising I've done generally promotes something.
It says, "Here's company A, and here's what we're offering."
In our current ads for Citigroup's private bank, for example,
we talk about services such as global investment advice,
generational financial planning and access to the global
resources of Citigroup.
Banking Strategies:
What's the optimal blend?
Cone:
In most cases in financial services, you should be doing
product advertising that reinforces the brand. You don't
need pure brand advertising. Each major business unit
should be promoting the products and services they offer
in an integrated campaign.
Banking Strategies:
What are the key issues in building a company's brand?
Cone:
There are three elements that I always consider. The first
is to create excitement in the marketplace. How do we
get people excited, both employees and customers? Secondly,
how do we continually create news about the products and
services we're offering? And finally, how do we create
a really compelling emotional connection with customers?
At the end of the day, you have to
differentiate yourself from all the other guys out there
who are offering very similar products and services. How
do you do that visually so people immediately can understand
you're different? In the case of Coca Cola, the distinction
is the shape of its bottle and its logo. For Marlboro,
it's the cowboy. At American Express, it's the "blue box"
which says "American Express."
In the case of Citigroup's asset management
business, we decided to differentiate ourselves, in all
of our promotional materials, by visually showing our
mutual fund managers and their investment strategies.
So the promotion is focused on an individual fund manager
or team of fund managers. You get to see who they are
and hear them talk in their own words about their philosophy
of investing. That's fairly unique in the mutual fund
industry.
And I think it has worked for us. You
really should know, after all, who's managing your money.
Banking Strategies:
From a managerial perspective, what are the key elements
in designing and implementing a campaign like that?
Cone:
It's critical to get all of the senior management of the
business unit heavily involved with the campaign. I want
them to be part of the process, and I want and need their
input.
At the end of the day, the senior management
of the business needs to be comfortable, and my job is
to make them comfortable. If they buy into the campaign,
hopefully the rest of the employees will as well. If there
are a whole lot of people who aren't comfortable, you
should probably re-think the campaign.
The company's employees are going to
be your warmest admirers and your severest critics all
at once. I talk personally with employees at all levels,
from the janitor to the CEO. And that's not just a platitude;
I think that's a good way to vet an idea.
Banking Strategies:
Why is it so necessary to get employees on board?
Cone:
If employees are excited about a campaign, that's a good
sign that consumers will be thrilled. Word of mouth is
a powerful thing. If employees really like what they see,
they will tell family and friends, who will tell other
people.
In any business, employees should be
viewed as insiders and allowed to preview everything.
They're your front-line ambassadors. If they don't like
your work, it's just going to sit out there with no support
from them during their interaction with customers. If
they are excited, the enthusiasm will transfer to customers.
It's really that basic.
You can tell if the campaign is going
to be good or not based on initial employee reaction.
And that's true of any business, whether it's financial
services or any other industry.
Banking Strategies:
How much do you rely on outside experts to design these
campaigns?
Cone:
I don't use outside consultants much, although they're
good for some things, like objective research and focus
groups.
For advertising work per se, we would
use an agency and try to give them as much latitude as
possible to come up with creative options. In the initial
phase of developing a concept for a campaign, it's always
best not to hamstring the agency with all the reasons
you can't do something. You can always get to that later.
Thinking outside the box is a good
thing, because inside the box is where everybody else
hangs out!
Banking
Strategies: Have you ever encountered major resistance
and had to pull back from a concept?
Cone:
Well, sure. But generally, it's been in areas I had no
business being in the first place.
When I was at KeyCorp, for example,
I thought we should create a kind of mega branch where
automotive dealers could actually display their cars and
customers could get a car loan — the same with boat
dealers. I also thought of putting kiosks in places like
Home Depot where you could get a home equity loan.
No one else thought this was a good
idea and we never did it. Sometimes marketing people —
I'd bet even me — don't really spend enough time
on the front lines figuring out how long it would take
for these great ideas to pay back.
Banking Strategies:
Looking back over your career, what marketing campaigns
stand out as home runs?
Cone:
The campaign at Fidelity Investments, with former fund
manager Peter Lynch and actors Lily Tomlin and Don Rickles,
was an across-the-board home run. Employees loved it,
customers loved it and the business flourished.
At KeyCorp, promotions with actor Anthony
Edwards were a huge hit and a similar success across all
those constituencies, starting first with employees.
At American Express, my biggest homerun,
believe it or not, involved another side of marketing:
the marketing database used to create campaigns with partners
of American Express. I was able to convince the technology
people to move from serial processing to massive parallel
processing, which allowed for a quantum leap in more efficient
and effective use of that database.
Banking Strategies:
Looking to the future, where do you see the best opportunities
for financial services marketing?
Cone:
There's an opportunity for banks in particular to get
out there and talk about the concerns of baby boomers
while offering financial solutions. Right now, we're letting
some of the other nonbank companies do that — Fidelity
and Charles Schwab & Co. come to mind. Banks are passing
up a great opportunity to position themselves as offering
solutions for retiring baby boomers.
Part of that has to do with a perception
among consumers — and some banks themselves —
that banks don't offer top-notch investment options. We
certainly don't feel that way at Citigroup because we
have a very strong asset management group and brokerage
unit. But some other institutions might want to partner
with somebody, or perhaps just make the point that they're
better at this business than people think.
At the moment, however, we're letting
bank competitors get way too much of this business.
Mr.
Cline is senior editor of Banking Strategies.
Copyright © 2004 by Banking
Strategies, published by BAI.
back
to top |