| Digitizing
the Telephone
By Bill Stoneman
Intrigued by Internet-based telephony
that promises cost savings and productivity improvement?
Expect to spend some time analyzing your existing telecommunications
infrastructure.
Like many large financial institutions,
Sovereign Bancorp Inc. frequently moves employees around,
whether it's just to the next cubicle or across town.
Most of those moves require calling in a telephone contractor,
who shifts wires around inside an office's phone closet
or reprograms the private branch exchange (PBX) serving
the particular office so staff members can keep their
phone numbers.
Since those contractors charge as much
as $125 per visit, these changes can cost a bank like
Sovereign $250,000 a year, according to John McCarthy,
the Philadelphia-based company's chief technology officer.
He bases his estimate on the expense of moving lines for
a quarter of Sovereign's 9,500 employees each year.
However, with the advent of new phone
systems based on Internet communications, the expense
of a move should start to shrink. The reason: Internet-based
telecommunications involve programming modifications that
can be made centrally at the computer as opposed to requiring
a technician to physically switch wires around. Once systems
are installed, calls made over these networks are free
of telecom carrier-imposed charges.
Benefits like this have created excitement
around the technology known as Voice Over Internet Protocol
(VoIP), or "IP Telephony." While there are some subtle
differences that determine when it's appropriate to use
one term over the other, both refer to the general process
by which telephone calls are made over data network lines
rather than standard telephone land lines or wireless
links (see sidebar, page 8). Appropriately implemented,
these systems provide productivity gains as well as cost
savings.
VoIP is of interest to many different
industries, but advocates say its potential could be especially
significant in banking. Banks, whose offices and staff
are geographically dispersed, make a lot of inter-company
calls. With VoIP, most of those calls could be handled
over the bank's data network and, therefore, free of charge.
The technology merits careful study.
Costs, staff impact and sound quality will influence decision-making.
The economic case is much stronger
for replacing fully depreciated equipment or when building
new facilities. Sovereign, for example, is focusing its
efforts on new offices and branches of acquired banks,
where it is performing work on existing data networks
in the course of converting branches to its computer system.
Though its IT executives are enthusiastic about the future
of VoIP, the bank has deployed it in just over one-fifth
of its phone extensions so far.
As with many technology implementations,
the cost of employee training must be factored into the
equation. VoIP can require a steep learning curve for
many workers.
The issue of sound degradation is another
consideration. Since the technology of Internet communications
involves compression of digital files, sound quality can
suffer depending on the extent of that compression.
Keeping those limitations in mind,
however, Internet-based telephony is likely to play an
increasing role in bank telecommunications in the years
ahead. "I don't think there's much chance of it not becoming
the standard," McCarthy says.
Savings
Achieved
Don Ellis, chief financial officer
with American Community Bancshares Inc. in Charlotte,
says installing an IP phone system in a branch costs between
$6,000 and $8,000, compared to a range of between $10,000
and $12,000 for traditional systems, of which the PBX
constitutes the major share of the expense. Approximately
70% of the carrier toll charges, whose monthly ongoing
costs averaged between $500 and $600 a month per branch,
were eliminated, according to Ellis. American Community,
which has $400 million in assets, installed IP systems
in all 11 of its branches in May 2003.
Separate telephone and data staffs
can also be merged, often improving productivity. And
when legacy gear is replaced with IP switching and IP
phones, nearly everything Ñ from system troubleshooting
to assigning an extension to the newest employee Ñ
can be managed from a computer keyboard anywhere on the
system.
Birmingham-based SouthTrust Corp.,
which undertook one of the largest multi-location deployments
to date, estimated its annual savings at $5.7 million
before it was acquired last November by Wachovia Corp,
Charlotte. Those savings include a 40% reduction in local
charges and leased lines, a 75% drop in move/ add/change
expenses, a 95% reduction in conference calling expenses
and a 60% decline in outbound long distance charges, according
to Carl Owen, leader of the SouthTrust project.
Now senior vice president and head
of converged networking for Wachovia, Owen says the ability
to control the system centrally has significantly reduced
the operational cost of the converged voice and data system.
John Studdard, senior vice president
and chief information officer of Lydian Trust Co., based
in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., agrees with Owen on the benefits
of centralized management. Lydian Trust, which is the
parent of $1.3 billion Lydian Private Bank, installed
1,000 IP phones in 17 offices around the country. Just
two telecommunications engineers are required to keep
those phones in working order.
"That would not have been possible with
a legacy PBX infrastructure," Studdard says.
IP Catches
On
Though VoIP and IP telephony aren't
household terms yet, they're clearly attracting interest,
according to Yankee Group, a Boston-based telecom research
and consulting company. Most large companies have begun
deployments, albeit quite small in scope, says Zeus Kerravala,
vice president for enterprise infrastructure with Yankee.
Of the approximately $12 billion corporate
America spent on total voice infrastructure last year,
about $2 billion was on VoIP and IP telephony, Kerravala
says. He expects investment in IP gear to catch up to
spending on traditional telephone equipment by 2006.
Major solutions providers in this space
include Cisco Systems Inc., San Jose, Calif.; Avaya Inc.,
Basking Ridge, N.J.; Toronto-based Nortel Neworks Corp.;
AT&T, Bedminster, N.J.; ShoreTel Inc., Sunnyvale,
Calif.; and US LEC Corp., Charlotte.
Based on published reports and industry
sources, the biggest banking deployments to date appear
to be those initiated by SouthTrust and Abbey National
plc in the United Kingdom. They'll be eclipsed by Charlotte-based
Bank of America Corp., which last fall announced a plan
to install 180,000 IP phones over three years. Building
on SouthTrust's experience, Wachovia plans to deploy IP
telephony across most of the merged company over the next
two and a half years, covering about 65,000 phones, according
to Owen.
Banks should be thinking about converging
all their networks onto an IP system at the same time,
rather than just adding voice to the main data network,
recommends Rob Malnati, product development manager for
US LEC in Charlotte. This means, for example, using IP
to connect automated teller machines with the data center.
Malnati adds that bank reliance on
old computer systems that don't use modern communications
standards may impede their ability to take full advantage
of IP.
Telephony experts agree that the time
and place to consider IP systems depends entirely on company-specific
and site-specific factors. Characterizing an average ROI
potential is impossible because analyses depend on the
age and depreciation status of existing systems, whether
a company's existing data network has capacity to support
voice traffic without a major upgrade, and the status
of existing plans with traditional carriers. Banks need
to take into consideration, for example, whether they
pay a flat rate service for local calls or by the minute.
In addition, the cost of a new system
varies dramatically with several choices that companies
will make. IP telephones, for example, can cost several
hundred dollars. Most desktop computers, however, can
do the same work with inexpensive software, a headset
and a microphone. It's not surprising, then, that even
banks that are sold on IP telephony are picking and choosing
where to install it.
SouthTrust and Abbey National, which
was acquired in November by Grupo Santander of Spain,
installed new phones and phone systems throughout their
branch systems. Both have done far less in their buildings
housing back office staff. Those facilities are typically
served by huge PBXs, costing hundreds of thousands of
dollars. Replacing these systems with costly IP switching
gear just doesn't make sense until the PBXs live out their
usefulness, Owen says.
What Can
Go Wrong
With all its benefits, VoIP or IP telephony
is not without its technical challenges. One has to do
with the quality and configuration of the network. Routers
and switches need to be configured in such a way that
voice packets always have priority over all other system
traffic. Minute delays in the transmission of data are
never noticed, but will ruin the quality of sound.
"Most network managers have never dealt
with an application like voice before," says Yankee Group's
Kerravala.
The voice problems have led to some
horror stories. In the summer of 2003, for example, F&M
Bank in Clarksville, Tenn., started a deployment in its
accounting department. The quality of sound was so poor
that it yanked the phones after just four days. Terry
Skillington, an assistant vice president and head of the
bank's telecommunications, says F&M never did figure
out exactly what went wrong.
One tricky aspect of voice transmission
over Internet lines is the tradeoff between compression
and sound quality. Much of the cost savings in VoIP comes
from compressing the digital files that carry the sound.
But "the more you compress, the lower the quality of the
sound," says Gary Wass, head of communications architecture
and planning for Abbey National.
Abbey National executives say they
are pleased with a deployment that replaced the phone
systems in the company's branch offices over six months
in 2003. And they calculate that the changeover has achieved
savings worth more than $5.3 million annually. But Wass
says it required serious deliberations and questioning
of its vendors Cisco Systems Inc. and British Telecom.
"We debated long and hard with both Cisco and BT as to
what was an acceptable quality for phone calls."
Banks that outsource management of
their data networks need to carefully assess their vendors'
voice capabilities, rather than just assume they're up
to the job, agrees Studdard at Lydian Trust.
Bankers also need to keep training
top of mind. A VoIP deployment can backfire if employees
can't operate the equipment efficiently. While simply
picking up the phone and making a call isn't difficult
under the new system, many users falter when they move
on to more complicated things like transferring calls
or setting up conference calls.
"That is where we started to get into
problems," says Wass at Abbey National, who likens the
situation to programming a home VCR: Some people take
to it right away while others never figure out how to
do more than the simplest tasks.
At Abbey National, customer complaints
started coming in when calls were cut off or transferred
into oblivion. In response, the bank stepped up its training
as the implementation progressed. Wass and his colleagues
asked branch staffers to call friends and then to set
up conference calls with company employees in other branches,
just for the sake of gaining experience. Results were
mixed, however.
Despite such problems, executives at
Sovereign, SouthTrust, and Abbey National all express
confidence that installing Internet-based phone systems
was the correct thing to do. Sovereign, for example, ran
into voice problems with the new system but simply concluded
that its network configuration needed work.
Says McCarthy, "We have not had an
instance yet where we said, 'Oh, God, why did we do this?'"
Questions
or comments about this article? Post them at the Banking
Strategies blog.
Mr.
Stoneman is a freelance writer based in Albany, NY.
Copyright © 2005 by Banking
Strategies, published by BAI.
back
to top |